首页> 外文OA文献 >Estimated Albumin Excretion Rate Versus Urine Albumin-Creatinine Ratio for the Assessment of Albuminuria: A Diagnostic Test Study From the Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease (PREVEND) Study
【2h】

Estimated Albumin Excretion Rate Versus Urine Albumin-Creatinine Ratio for the Assessment of Albuminuria: A Diagnostic Test Study From the Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease (PREVEND) Study

机译:估计白蛋白排泄率与尿白蛋白-肌酐比值评估白蛋白尿:来自预防肾脏和血管末期疾病(PREVEND)的诊断测试研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) in spot urine samples is recommended for albuminuria screening instead of measured albumin excretion rate (mAER) in 24-hour urine collections. In patients with extremes of muscle mass, differences in spot urine creatinine values may lead to under-or overestimation of mAER by ACR. We hypothesized that calculating estimated AER (eAER) using spot ACR and estimated creatinine excretion rate (eCER) may improve albuminuria assessment. Study Design: Diagnostic test study. Setting & Participants: 2,711 community-living individuals from the general population of the Netherlands participating in the PREVEND (Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease) Study. Index Test: eAER was computed as the product of ACR and eCER. eCER was computed using 3 previously validated methods (Ix, Ellam, and Walser). Reference Test: mAER, based on two 24-hour urine collections. Accuracy of the eAER and ACR were defined as the percentage of participants falling within 30% (P30) of mAER. Results: Mean age was 49 years, 46% were men, mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 84 +/- 15 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and median mAER was 7.2 (IQR, 5.4-11.0) mg/d. Mean measured CER was 1,381 mg/d, and median ACR was 4.9 mg/g. Using the Ix equation, median eAER was 6.4 mg/d. In the full cohort, eAER was more accurate and less biased compared to ACR (P-30, 48.9% vs 33.6%; bias, -34.2% vs -14.1%, respectively). In subgroup analysis, improvement was most notable in the middle and highest weight tertiles and in men. Using the other methods for eCER produced similar results. Limitations: Little ethnic heterogeneity and a generally healthy cohort make extension of findings to other races and the chronically ill uncertain. Conclusions: In a large community-dwelling cohort, eAER was more accurate than ACR in assessing albuminuria. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. This is a US Government Work. There are no restrictions on its use.
机译:背景:建议将尿样中的白蛋白-肌酸酐比(ACR)用于蛋白尿筛查,而不是24小时尿液收集中测量的白蛋白排泄率(mAER)。对于肌肉量极高的患者,尿肌酐现货值的差异可能会导致ACR对mAER的估计过低或过高。我们假设使用现场ACR和估计的肌酐排泄率(eCER)计算估计的AER(eAER)可以改善白蛋白尿评估。研究设计:诊断测试研究。参与者:来自荷兰总人口的2,711名社区居民参加了PREVEND(预防肾脏和血管末期疾病)研究。指数测试:eAER计算为ACR和eCER的乘积。使用3种先前验证过的方法(Ix,Ellam和Walser)计算eCER。参考测试:mAER,基于两次24小时尿液收集。 eAER和ACR的准确度定义为落在mAER的30%(P30)以内的参与者百分比。结果:平均年龄为49岁,男性为46%,平均肾小球滤过率估计为84 +/- 15 mL / min / 1.73 m(2),中位数mAER为7.2(IQR,5.4-11.0)mg / d。平均测得的CER为1,381 mg / d,中位ACR为4.9 mg / g。使用Ix方程,中位eAER为6.4 mg / d。与ACR相比,在整个队列研究中,eAER的准确性更高,偏倚也更小(P-30,分别为48.9%和33.6%;偏倚,分别为-34.2%和-14.1%)。在亚组分析中,中,最高体重的三分位数和男性的改善最为明显。使用其他方法进行eCER产生了相似的结果。局限性:几乎没有种族异质性,而且总体上健康的队列使研究结果扩展到其他种族,也使长期患病的人无法确定。结论:在一个大型社区居民队列中,eAER在评估蛋白尿方面比ACR更准确。由Elsevier Inc.代表美国国家肾脏基金会出版。这是美国政府的工作。没有使用限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号